https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108455 The court upheld the validity of the interim award dated 23-2-1998, rejecting the respondent-Board's objections regarding an unauthorized arbitration agreement and lack of all Arbitrators' signatures. It emphasized that format irregularities are curable and objections to the award's validity were deemed insufficient. The court clarified that challenges to the Arbitral Tribunal's competence should be addressed through proper channels and not during execution proceedings. Additionally, it highlighted the importance of following the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996's provisions and timelines for executing awards as decrees, including the requirement for all Arbitrators' signatures on the award. en-us Fri, 28 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:21:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108455 The court upheld the validity of the interim award dated 23-2-1998, rejecting the respondent-Board's objections regarding an unauthorized arbitration agreement and lack of all Arbitrators' signatures. It emphasized that format irregularities are curable and objections to the award's validity were deemed insufficient. The court clarified that challenges to the Arbitral Tribunal's competence should be addressed through proper channels and not during execution proceedings. Additionally, it highlighted the importance of following the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996's provisions and timelines for executing awards as decrees, including the requirement for all Arbitrators' signatures on the award. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 28 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108455