https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108454 The writ petition was dismissed as the respondent was found not to be a State or an agency/instrumentality of the State under Article 12 of the Constitution of India. Consequently, the court held that the respondent is not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The petitioner's claims for arrears of salary, gratuity, provident fund, earned leave encashment, and other allowances with interest were not addressed due to the respondent's non-qualifying status. The court dismissed the petition with no costs. en-us Wed, 26 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:17:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108454 The writ petition was dismissed as the respondent was found not to be a State or an agency/instrumentality of the State under Article 12 of the Constitution of India. Consequently, the court held that the respondent is not amenable to writ jurisdiction under Article 226. The petitioner's claims for arrears of salary, gratuity, provident fund, earned leave encashment, and other allowances with interest were not addressed due to the respondent's non-qualifying status. The court dismissed the petition with no costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 26 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108454