<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 352 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108453</link>
    <description>The court quashed legal proceedings against the petitioners, directors of a company, in C.C. Nos. 132 and 133 of 1989. The court criticized the lack of progress in the trials and the respondent&#039;s failure to prosecute, leading to the decision to quash the proceedings. The court emphasized the need for timely prosecution and individual case assessment under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:15:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 352 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108453</link>
      <description>The court quashed legal proceedings against the petitioners, directors of a company, in C.C. Nos. 132 and 133 of 1989. The court criticized the lack of progress in the trials and the respondent&#039;s failure to prosecute, leading to the decision to quash the proceedings. The court emphasized the need for timely prosecution and individual case assessment under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108453</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>