https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108449 The appeal was successful as the court found that the order-in-appeal affirming the confiscation of goods, vehicle, and penalty imposition was legally unsustainable. The court highlighted the lack of concrete evidence supporting the allegations of clandestine removal and emphasized the necessity for substantiated claims. As a result, the appellants' appeals were allowed with appropriate relief under the law. en-us Tue, 25 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Mar 2012 16:04:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108449 The appeal was successful as the court found that the order-in-appeal affirming the confiscation of goods, vehicle, and penalty imposition was legally unsustainable. The court highlighted the lack of concrete evidence supporting the allegations of clandestine removal and emphasized the necessity for substantiated claims. As a result, the appellants' appeals were allowed with appropriate relief under the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 25 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108449