<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 348 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108439</link>
    <description>The court upheld the expulsion of the appellant from the Madras Stock Exchange, affirming the validity of the relevant articles and rules. The review application was allowed due to apparent errors in the original judgment, and subsequent appeals and contempt applications were dismissed. The Stock Exchange&#039;s actions were found to be lawful and consistent with the regulatory framework governing stock exchanges and stock brokers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:15:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 348 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108439</link>
      <description>The court upheld the expulsion of the appellant from the Madras Stock Exchange, affirming the validity of the relevant articles and rules. The review application was allowed due to apparent errors in the original judgment, and subsequent appeals and contempt applications were dismissed. The Stock Exchange&#039;s actions were found to be lawful and consistent with the regulatory framework governing stock exchanges and stock brokers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>