<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 348 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108439</link>
    <description>A recognised stock exchange incorporated as a company limited by guarantee may validly include articles providing for suspension or expulsion of members, because the special securities law regime permits disciplinary rules and bye-laws governing member conduct, and such provisions are not repugnant to the Companies Act, 1956. A member who became managing director of another company engaged in a business unconnected with securities incurred a disqualification under the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules, 1957, making expulsion permissible. Once the substantive basis for the member&#039;s continuance failed, later contempt and compensation orders founded on interim protection could not survive and were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:15:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145456" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 348 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108439</link>
      <description>A recognised stock exchange incorporated as a company limited by guarantee may validly include articles providing for suspension or expulsion of members, because the special securities law regime permits disciplinary rules and bye-laws governing member conduct, and such provisions are not repugnant to the Companies Act, 1956. A member who became managing director of another company engaged in a business unconnected with securities incurred a disqualification under the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Rules, 1957, making expulsion permissible. Once the substantive basis for the member&#039;s continuance failed, later contempt and compensation orders founded on interim protection could not survive and were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>