https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108435 The court ruled in favor of allowing co-respondents to cross-examine each other based on conflicting interests in a case involving a dispute over liability under the Companies Act, 1956. Emphasizing the importance of cross-examination in uncovering truth and ensuring fairness, the court directed the Commissioner to permit the cross-examination of relevant witnesses, extending the time for evidence recording. This decision underscores the significance of providing all parties with a fair opportunity to present their case effectively and challenge evidence presented against them. en-us Thu, 20 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Mar 2012 15:09:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108435 The court ruled in favor of allowing co-respondents to cross-examine each other based on conflicting interests in a case involving a dispute over liability under the Companies Act, 1956. Emphasizing the importance of cross-examination in uncovering truth and ensuring fairness, the court directed the Commissioner to permit the cross-examination of relevant witnesses, extending the time for evidence recording. This decision underscores the significance of providing all parties with a fair opportunity to present their case effectively and challenge evidence presented against them. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 20 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108435