https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108425 The Tribunal set aside the impugned Order, allowing the appeals of the appellant-company and all directors. The Tribunal emphasized the limited jurisdiction of the Commissioner in remand proceedings, highlighting that penalties cannot be imposed beyond the scope of the remand order. It was established that the appellant-company was not liable for differential duty, leading to the conclusion that no penalties were justified. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the specified scope in remand proceedings. en-us Tue, 18 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:10:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108425 The Tribunal set aside the impugned Order, allowing the appeals of the appellant-company and all directors. The Tribunal emphasized the limited jurisdiction of the Commissioner in remand proceedings, highlighting that penalties cannot be imposed beyond the scope of the remand order. It was established that the appellant-company was not liable for differential duty, leading to the conclusion that no penalties were justified. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, emphasizing the importance of adhering to the specified scope in remand proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 18 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108425