<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 332 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108422</link>
    <description>The appeals were disposed of with the decision to set aside the confiscation of the seized currency due to the lack of satisfying the necessary elements under the Customs Act. However, penalties against the appellant were upheld for his involvement in the gold smuggling operation, emphasizing the importance of clear evidence linking seized items to illegal activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:02:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 332 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108422</link>
      <description>The appeals were disposed of with the decision to set aside the confiscation of the seized currency due to the lack of satisfying the necessary elements under the Customs Act. However, penalties against the appellant were upheld for his involvement in the gold smuggling operation, emphasizing the importance of clear evidence linking seized items to illegal activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>