<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (1) TMI 1245 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108419</link>
    <description>A deliberate and informed election of classification or exemption notification binds the assessee, and the position cannot be reopened later merely because another benefit is discovered. Where the taxpayer knowingly paid duty under one chosen notification and only afterward attempted to switch to an alternative basis for refund, the claim failed because the omission was not inadvertent but a conscious choice. The earlier classification approval was relevant only as support for the principle that a selected fiscal position, once adopted, cannot be altered inconsistently at a later stage. Refund was therefore not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 13:56:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145436" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (1) TMI 1245 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108419</link>
      <description>A deliberate and informed election of classification or exemption notification binds the assessee, and the position cannot be reopened later merely because another benefit is discovered. Where the taxpayer knowingly paid duty under one chosen notification and only afterward attempted to switch to an alternative basis for refund, the claim failed because the omission was not inadvertent but a conscious choice. The earlier classification approval was relevant only as support for the principle that a selected fiscal position, once adopted, cannot be altered inconsistently at a later stage. Refund was therefore not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>