<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 328 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108414</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the resolution passed by the Board of Directors for the sale of immovable properties, allowing the general meeting to proceed and ultimately accepting a bid for the sale. The company petition filed by a shareholder was deemed not maintainable due to lack of special reasons and failure to prove the company&#039;s inability to pay debts. The court emphasized the authority of the Board of Directors in making business decisions, criticizing the Company Court for interfering without evidence of fraud or mismanagement. The appeals were allowed, the company petition was dismissed, and the Board&#039;s authority was reaffirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 13:45:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 328 - HIGH COURT OF KERALA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108414</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the resolution passed by the Board of Directors for the sale of immovable properties, allowing the general meeting to proceed and ultimately accepting a bid for the sale. The company petition filed by a shareholder was deemed not maintainable due to lack of special reasons and failure to prove the company&#039;s inability to pay debts. The court emphasized the authority of the Board of Directors in making business decisions, criticizing the Company Court for interfering without evidence of fraud or mismanagement. The appeals were allowed, the company petition was dismissed, and the Board&#039;s authority was reaffirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>