<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 545 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108413</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Kolkata ruled in favor of the appellant company, stating that the demand of duty and penalty imposed were not justified as the company provided evidence of actual production. The Tribunal found that the company should not be burdened to explain why production was less than the fixed capacity without evidence to the contrary. The Stay Petition was allowed in favor of the appellant company.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 13:44:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145430" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 545 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108413</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT, Kolkata ruled in favor of the appellant company, stating that the demand of duty and penalty imposed were not justified as the company provided evidence of actual production. The Tribunal found that the company should not be burdened to explain why production was less than the fixed capacity without evidence to the contrary. The Stay Petition was allowed in favor of the appellant company.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108413</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>