https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108410 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a notice issued by the respondent bank under section 13 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Ordinance, 2002. The court held that it could not examine the legality of the notice through a writ petition, emphasizing the petitioner's responsibility to prove repayment of dues directly to the bank. The court highlighted that challenges to such notices should be addressed through legal channels like the Debt Recovery Tribunal, ultimately maintaining the legislative intent and advising parties to seek appropriate legal remedies for any disputes. en-us Tue, 11 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Apr 2012 16:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108410 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging a notice issued by the respondent bank under section 13 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Ordinance, 2002. The court held that it could not examine the legality of the notice through a writ petition, emphasizing the petitioner's responsibility to prove repayment of dues directly to the bank. The court highlighted that challenges to such notices should be addressed through legal channels like the Debt Recovery Tribunal, ultimately maintaining the legislative intent and advising parties to seek appropriate legal remedies for any disputes. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 11 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108410