<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 489 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108404</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for verification and consideration of the appellant&#039;s claim for credit on lost duplicate copies of invoices. Emphasizing the need for evidence of loss and adherence to existing rules, the Tribunal highlighted discrepancies in credit endorsements on zerox versus original copies of invoices. The case was sent back to the original authorities for further inquiry and verification of original copies to ensure compliance with legal requirements, allowing the appeal by way of remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 13:29:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145421" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 489 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108404</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for verification and consideration of the appellant&#039;s claim for credit on lost duplicate copies of invoices. Emphasizing the need for evidence of loss and adherence to existing rules, the Tribunal highlighted discrepancies in credit endorsements on zerox versus original copies of invoices. The case was sent back to the original authorities for further inquiry and verification of original copies to ensure compliance with legal requirements, allowing the appeal by way of remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>