https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108399 Further pre-admission notice to a company at the same address was treated as unnecessary where earlier notices had returned unserved and the record showed the registered office was no longer available there. The court reasoned that a repeated notice would be futile, and that newspaper publication would add avoidable cost and consume judicial resources. It also noted that, under the Company (Court) Rules, issuance of a pre-admission show-cause notice is discretionary rather than mandatory. The winding-up petition was therefore admitted without insisting on fresh notice at the stated address. en-us Fri, 31 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Mar 2012 13:23:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108399 Further pre-admission notice to a company at the same address was treated as unnecessary where earlier notices had returned unserved and the record showed the registered office was no longer available there. The court reasoned that a repeated notice would be futile, and that newspaper publication would add avoidable cost and consume judicial resources. It also noted that, under the Company (Court) Rules, issuance of a pre-admission show-cause notice is discretionary rather than mandatory. The winding-up petition was therefore admitted without insisting on fresh notice at the stated address. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 31 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108399