https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108395 The appeal was rejected as the Adjudicating Authority's order was found to be compliant with the remand directions. The Tribunal clarified that the remand was not for challenging the correctness of the Department's formula but for ensuring compliance with natural justice principles. The appellants' argument that the Department's formula for capacity determination was flawed and did not consider crucial variables was dismissed. The Tribunal also determined that Rule 3(1) of the Induction Furnace Annual Capacity Determination Rules, regarding invoice-based capacity determination, was not applicable in this case. en-us Mon, 23 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Mar 2012 13:16:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108395 The appeal was rejected as the Adjudicating Authority's order was found to be compliant with the remand directions. The Tribunal clarified that the remand was not for challenging the correctness of the Department's formula but for ensuring compliance with natural justice principles. The appellants' argument that the Department's formula for capacity determination was flawed and did not consider crucial variables was dismissed. The Tribunal also determined that Rule 3(1) of the Induction Furnace Annual Capacity Determination Rules, regarding invoice-based capacity determination, was not applicable in this case. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 23 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108395