<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 486 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108395</link>
    <description>A remand confined to correcting natural justice defects and referring to relevant measurements did not permit a fresh challenge to the capacity formula itself, so the adjudicating authority&#039;s compliance with the remand directions was upheld. Rule 3(1) of the Induction Furnace Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997 was held inapplicable because it concerns the invoice of the original manufacturer or supplier, and the furnace had already been installed and later modified. The appellant could not rely on the supplier&#039;s invoice to dispute the modified capacity, and the Department&#039;s capacity determination remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 13:16:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 486 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108395</link>
      <description>A remand confined to correcting natural justice defects and referring to relevant measurements did not permit a fresh challenge to the capacity formula itself, so the adjudicating authority&#039;s compliance with the remand directions was upheld. Rule 3(1) of the Induction Furnace Annual Capacity Determination Rules, 1997 was held inapplicable because it concerns the invoice of the original manufacturer or supplier, and the furnace had already been installed and later modified. The appellant could not rely on the supplier&#039;s invoice to dispute the modified capacity, and the Department&#039;s capacity determination remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>