https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108394 The court found in favor of the defendant, ruling that the arbitration clause in the partnership deed was binding and mandatory. It directed the parties to attempt an amicable settlement and, if unresolved, to refer the disputes to arbitration as outlined in the deed. The court emphasized limited judicial intervention under the Arbitration Act, 1996, and empowered the Arbitral Tribunal to decide on its jurisdiction. The application was allowed, and the suit was disposed of accordingly, with provisions for the appointment of a retired judge as the sole arbitrator if needed. en-us Wed, 29 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Mar 2012 13:18:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108394 The court found in favor of the defendant, ruling that the arbitration clause in the partnership deed was binding and mandatory. It directed the parties to attempt an amicable settlement and, if unresolved, to refer the disputes to arbitration as outlined in the deed. The court emphasized limited judicial intervention under the Arbitration Act, 1996, and empowered the Arbitral Tribunal to decide on its jurisdiction. The application was allowed, and the suit was disposed of accordingly, with provisions for the appointment of a retired judge as the sole arbitrator if needed. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 29 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108394