<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 482 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108388</link>
    <description>Extended limitation under Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act requires a finding of fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts, or contravention with intent to evade duty; mere rule contravention is insufficient. As no finding of intent to evade was recorded, the larger limitation period was unavailable, rendering the demand time-barred and the penalty unsustainable. Excisability of transmission-tower structural materials depends on whether manufacture produces new, identifiable and marketable goods; marketability had not been examined. Enhancement of assessable value without disclosure of the underlying report or evidence of price-variation billing also breached natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 13:05:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 482 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108388</link>
      <description>Extended limitation under Section 11A(1) of the Central Excise Act requires a finding of fraud, collusion, wilful misstatement, suppression of facts, or contravention with intent to evade duty; mere rule contravention is insufficient. As no finding of intent to evade was recorded, the larger limitation period was unavailable, rendering the demand time-barred and the penalty unsustainable. Excisability of transmission-tower structural materials depends on whether manufacture produces new, identifiable and marketable goods; marketability had not been examined. Enhancement of assessable value without disclosure of the underlying report or evidence of price-variation billing also breached natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>