https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108387 The Supreme Court remitted the matter to the High Court because the Division Bench had examined only two grounds for setting aside the arbitral award, while several other grounds relied on by the Single Judge had not been considered. Those remaining grounds were capable of independently sustaining or reversing the setting aside of the award, so they had to be decided first. The High Court was directed to undertake fresh consideration of those unresolved grounds. en-us Tue, 28 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108387 The Supreme Court remitted the matter to the High Court because the Division Bench had examined only two grounds for setting aside the arbitral award, while several other grounds relied on by the Single Judge had not been considered. Those remaining grounds were capable of independently sustaining or reversing the setting aside of the award, so they had to be decided first. The High Court was directed to undertake fresh consideration of those unresolved grounds. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 28 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108387