https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108377 The court allowed the revision petition, setting aside the conviction and sentences imposed on the revision petitioners. The prosecution against the accused company was deemed valid. However, the complaint was held to be barred by limitation due to the improper re-presentation of the cheque after issuing the first legal notice. The court ordered any fine amount paid to be refunded, concluding that the complaint filed was beyond the period of limitation. en-us Fri, 24 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:48:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108377 The court allowed the revision petition, setting aside the conviction and sentences imposed on the revision petitioners. The prosecution against the accused company was deemed valid. However, the complaint was held to be barred by limitation due to the improper re-presentation of the cheque after issuing the first legal notice. The court ordered any fine amount paid to be refunded, concluding that the complaint filed was beyond the period of limitation. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 24 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108377