<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 473 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108372</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal confirming the enhancement of the declared value of goods from USD 1315 to USD 1850 per MT. The Tribunal found the lower authority&#039;s basis for enhancement flawed due to incomparable import quantities. The appellants were directed to provide documentation to verify the contracted import quantity. Subsequent imports accepted at a lower value supported the reasonableness of the declared value. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration by the original authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:39:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 473 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108372</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal confirming the enhancement of the declared value of goods from USD 1315 to USD 1850 per MT. The Tribunal found the lower authority&#039;s basis for enhancement flawed due to incomparable import quantities. The appellants were directed to provide documentation to verify the contracted import quantity. Subsequent imports accepted at a lower value supported the reasonableness of the declared value. The matter was remanded for fresh consideration by the original authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108372</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>