https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108367 The Revenue appealed against the dropping of proceedings by the Commissioner due to brand name usage on different products. The respondents used the brand names "Queen" and "Supreme" on Tube light patties, while another company owned the same brand names for Chokes. The Tribunal upheld the dropping of proceedings, emphasizing that the brand names were used on different products, following a previous judgment. The Tribunal found no error in the Commissioner's decision and rejected the Revenue's appeal. en-us Thu, 12 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:38:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108367 The Revenue appealed against the dropping of proceedings by the Commissioner due to brand name usage on different products. The respondents used the brand names "Queen" and "Supreme" on Tube light patties, while another company owned the same brand names for Chokes. The Tribunal upheld the dropping of proceedings, emphasizing that the brand names were used on different products, following a previous judgment. The Tribunal found no error in the Commissioner's decision and rejected the Revenue's appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 12 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108367