https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108355 The court dismissed the petitioners' application for impleading in the Debts Recovery Tribunal, emphasizing the availability of other remedies under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993. It found the Registrar's actions to be illegal and without jurisdiction, highlighting discrepancies and indications of judicial dishonesty. Stressing the importance of natural justice principles, the court directed the Central Government to prioritize experienced personnel in Debts Recovery Tribunal appointments to prevent similar issues. The petitioners were granted liberty to pursue remedies under the law, with a focus on fair adjudication and procedural adherence. en-us Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:26:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108355 The court dismissed the petitioners' application for impleading in the Debts Recovery Tribunal, emphasizing the availability of other remedies under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993. It found the Registrar's actions to be illegal and without jurisdiction, highlighting discrepancies and indications of judicial dishonesty. Stressing the importance of natural justice principles, the court directed the Central Government to prioritize experienced personnel in Debts Recovery Tribunal appointments to prevent similar issues. The petitioners were granted liberty to pursue remedies under the law, with a focus on fair adjudication and procedural adherence. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108355