https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108355 A Registrar of the Debts Recovery Tribunal has only ministerial scrutiny functions under section 22 and the Procedure Rules, and cannot exercise judicial power to finally refuse or dismiss an interlocutory impleading application unless such authority is expressly conferred. The power under Rule 5 is confined to registration and rectification of defects, and administrative scrutiny cannot be treated as adjudication. The note also records that, despite procedural irregularity and a lack of fair opportunity, the impugned orders were not set aside because the applicants were not debtors, sureties or guarantors and could pursue their claimed rights, including disputed title issues, in appropriate proceedings. en-us Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 31 Mar 2012 12:26:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108355 A Registrar of the Debts Recovery Tribunal has only ministerial scrutiny functions under section 22 and the Procedure Rules, and cannot exercise judicial power to finally refuse or dismiss an interlocutory impleading application unless such authority is expressly conferred. The power under Rule 5 is confined to registration and rectification of defects, and administrative scrutiny cannot be treated as adjudication. The note also records that, despite procedural irregularity and a lack of fair opportunity, the impugned orders were not set aside because the applicants were not debtors, sureties or guarantors and could pursue their claimed rights, including disputed title issues, in appropriate proceedings. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 17 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108355