<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 650 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108338</link>
    <description>The court found that the penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act on the appellant for not debiting duty on 242 bags of cotton yarn was unjustified. The judge reduced the penalty to Rs. 5,000 from Rs. 2,22,745, considering the duty liability on the 8 seized bags to be Rs. 7,982. The judge emphasized that the penalty should have been imposed for procedural lapses under Rule 226 instead. The appeal was disposed of with the modified penalty amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145355" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 650 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108338</link>
      <description>The court found that the penalty imposed under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act on the appellant for not debiting duty on 242 bags of cotton yarn was unjustified. The judge reduced the penalty to Rs. 5,000 from Rs. 2,22,745, considering the duty liability on the 8 seized bags to be Rs. 7,982. The judge emphasized that the penalty should have been imposed for procedural lapses under Rule 226 instead. The appeal was disposed of with the modified penalty amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108338</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>