<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (11) TMI 644 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108328</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted a waiver of deposit of duties and penalties for multiple entities involved in the case, including Sarla Polyester Ltd., individuals linked to the company, and carriers transporting goods without duty payment. The decision was based on the interpretation of exemption notifications and relevant legal provisions, with the Tribunal emphasizing adherence to the plain meaning of statutes and notifications. The waiver was granted upon the applicants&#039; offer to deposit a specific amount, with recovery of the waived amounts stayed pending compliance. Additionally, the penalty imposed on a carrier was waived due to the carrier&#039;s lack of awareness of duty evasion during transportation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:58:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (11) TMI 644 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108328</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted a waiver of deposit of duties and penalties for multiple entities involved in the case, including Sarla Polyester Ltd., individuals linked to the company, and carriers transporting goods without duty payment. The decision was based on the interpretation of exemption notifications and relevant legal provisions, with the Tribunal emphasizing adherence to the plain meaning of statutes and notifications. The waiver was granted upon the applicants&#039; offer to deposit a specific amount, with recovery of the waived amounts stayed pending compliance. Additionally, the penalty imposed on a carrier was waived due to the carrier&#039;s lack of awareness of duty evasion during transportation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>