<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 368 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108296</link>
    <description>Acceptance of a final bill does not by itself bar a contractor from raising further claims; a waiver or estoppel arises only where the contractor expressly declares that no further claim will be made. Refusal to grant interest from the date of decree could not be corrected under section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, because such omission is not a clerical or arithmetical error. An arbitral award may be vulnerable where the arbitrator ignores material contractual clauses or acts beyond the contract, and claim items involving additional work, prolongation losses and material escalation were therefore remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145313" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 368 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108296</link>
      <description>Acceptance of a final bill does not by itself bar a contractor from raising further claims; a waiver or estoppel arises only where the contractor expressly declares that no further claim will be made. Refusal to grant interest from the date of decree could not be corrected under section 152 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, because such omission is not a clerical or arithmetical error. An arbitral award may be vulnerable where the arbitrator ignores material contractual clauses or acts beyond the contract, and claim items involving additional work, prolongation losses and material escalation were therefore remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>