<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (10) TMI 670 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108292</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the confiscation of Urad Dal and penalties imposed on the appellant for attempted illegal export to Nepal under the Customs Act, 1962. The tribunal found discrepancies in the evidence, ruling that the truck was not intended for illegal export. The appeal was allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellant and leading to the release of the confiscated truck. The judgment underscores the importance of thorough evidence examination and independent scrutiny in cases of alleged illegal exports, emphasizing the necessity of clear and substantiated evidence for confiscation and penalties under the Customs Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2018 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145309" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (10) TMI 670 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108292</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal set aside the confiscation of Urad Dal and penalties imposed on the appellant for attempted illegal export to Nepal under the Customs Act, 1962. The tribunal found discrepancies in the evidence, ruling that the truck was not intended for illegal export. The appeal was allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellant and leading to the release of the confiscated truck. The judgment underscores the importance of thorough evidence examination and independent scrutiny in cases of alleged illegal exports, emphasizing the necessity of clear and substantiated evidence for confiscation and penalties under the Customs Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108292</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>