<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (8) TMI 361 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108285</link>
    <description>A proposed amalgamation under the Companies Act, 1956 was approved because the equity shareholders of the transferor and transferee companies unanimously consented, no creditors existed, and no objections were received after notice publication. The Official Liquidator reported no prejudicial conduct in the affairs of the transferor companies, and the Regional Director raised no objection. On that record, the court found the requirements of the proviso to section 391(2) satisfied and saw no legal impediment to approval. The scheme was sanctioned, and the transferor companies were directed to stand dissolved without winding up on filing the certified order with the Registrar of Companies.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:42:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (8) TMI 361 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108285</link>
      <description>A proposed amalgamation under the Companies Act, 1956 was approved because the equity shareholders of the transferor and transferee companies unanimously consented, no creditors existed, and no objections were received after notice publication. The Official Liquidator reported no prejudicial conduct in the affairs of the transferor companies, and the Regional Director raised no objection. On that record, the court found the requirements of the proviso to section 391(2) satisfied and saw no legal impediment to approval. The scheme was sanctioned, and the transferor companies were directed to stand dissolved without winding up on filing the certified order with the Registrar of Companies.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>