<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (8) TMI 766 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108264</link>
    <description>Valuation of plastic scrap for duty was found unsustainably high because it was fixed close to the value of the finished sheets without supporting data from the appellants&#039; own scrap production or comparable market material. A best judgment assessment still required some evidentiary basis, so the valuation was set aside and remanded for fresh consideration. Penalty for short-levy of duty was also held unwarranted because there was no finding of dishonest or contumacious conduct, and the penalty was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:03:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (8) TMI 766 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108264</link>
      <description>Valuation of plastic scrap for duty was found unsustainably high because it was fixed close to the value of the finished sheets without supporting data from the appellants&#039; own scrap production or comparable market material. A best judgment assessment still required some evidentiary basis, so the valuation was set aside and remanded for fresh consideration. Penalty for short-levy of duty was also held unwarranted because there was no finding of dishonest or contumacious conduct, and the penalty was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>