<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 497 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108263</link>
    <description>At the section 11 referral stage under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, contentious questions on the existence or validity of an arbitration agreement are not finally to be decided by the Chief Justice or his designate; those objections fall within the arbitral tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction under section 16. The Court also treated the dispute arising from the tender documents and exchanged correspondence as one that had to be referred to arbitration, because the incorporation of the arbitration clause itself was disputed. The refusal to refer the matter was set aside, and the case was remitted for constitution of the arbitral tribunal and reference of the dispute.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 497 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108263</link>
      <description>At the section 11 referral stage under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, contentious questions on the existence or validity of an arbitration agreement are not finally to be decided by the Chief Justice or his designate; those objections fall within the arbitral tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction under section 16. The Court also treated the dispute arising from the tender documents and exchanged correspondence as one that had to be referred to arbitration, because the incorporation of the arbitration clause itself was disputed. The refusal to refer the matter was set aside, and the case was remitted for constitution of the arbitral tribunal and reference of the dispute.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108263</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>