<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 496 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108261</link>
    <description>The court dispensed with the requirement of convening meetings for Lufthansa and trade creditors due to their consent. Meetings for Inter-Corporate Depositors and staff creditors were to be held to consider and approve the updated Scheme for Compromise. The court found the scheme bona fide, reasonable, and prima facie feasible, ordering its consideration under section 391(1) of the Companies Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:59:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145278" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 496 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108261</link>
      <description>The court dispensed with the requirement of convening meetings for Lufthansa and trade creditors due to their consent. Meetings for Inter-Corporate Depositors and staff creditors were to be held to consider and approve the updated Scheme for Compromise. The court found the scheme bona fide, reasonable, and prima facie feasible, ordering its consideration under section 391(1) of the Companies Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>