https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108256 An admitted, broadly worded arbitration clause required referral of the dealership dispute to arbitration under section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; objections about short delivery and tampering with seals were matters for the arbitral tribunal under section 16, so the civil court should not have refused reference. The corporation's contractual power to suspend supply for breach of dealership obligations operated independently of the statutory regime under the Essential Commodities and weights-and-measures laws, so suspension could not be invalidated merely because statutory remedies also existed. Refusal to make the section 8 reference amounted to failure to exercise jurisdiction, making revision under section 115 CPC maintainable. en-us Wed, 23 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Jan 2026 14:18:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108256 An admitted, broadly worded arbitration clause required referral of the dealership dispute to arbitration under section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; objections about short delivery and tampering with seals were matters for the arbitral tribunal under section 16, so the civil court should not have refused reference. The corporation's contractual power to suspend supply for breach of dealership obligations operated independently of the statutory regime under the Essential Commodities and weights-and-measures laws, so suspension could not be invalidated merely because statutory remedies also existed. Refusal to make the section 8 reference amounted to failure to exercise jurisdiction, making revision under section 115 CPC maintainable. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 23 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108256