<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 483 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108241</link>
    <description>The court quashed the Chairperson&#039;s administrative orders and upheld the Member&#039;s judicial order, emphasizing that administrative actions cannot override judicial decisions. The writ petition was allowed, directing the Appellate Tribunal to expedite the appeals. Each party was instructed to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:53:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 483 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108241</link>
      <description>The court quashed the Chairperson&#039;s administrative orders and upheld the Member&#039;s judicial order, emphasizing that administrative actions cannot override judicial decisions. The writ petition was allowed, directing the Appellate Tribunal to expedite the appeals. Each party was instructed to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>