https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108238 Civil court jurisdiction remains available unless expressly or by necessary implication barred, and a dispute over alleged illegal dispossession and possession therefore fell within ordinary civil remedies; the suit was maintainable. The note also states that the High Court, in review, could not contradict its earlier direction for expeditious disposal of the statutory appeal by allowing a stay application to delay the inquiry, because that was inconsistent with prompt adjudication under the governing statute; the contrary review direction was unsustainable. The matters were set aside and remitted for fresh decision on merits, with the statutory proceeding to be decided expeditiously. en-us Mon, 07 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 06 Oct 2021 10:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108238 Civil court jurisdiction remains available unless expressly or by necessary implication barred, and a dispute over alleged illegal dispossession and possession therefore fell within ordinary civil remedies; the suit was maintainable. The note also states that the High Court, in review, could not contradict its earlier direction for expeditious disposal of the statutory appeal by allowing a stay application to delay the inquiry, because that was inconsistent with prompt adjudication under the governing statute; the contrary review direction was unsustainable. The matters were set aside and remitted for fresh decision on merits, with the statutory proceeding to be decided expeditiously. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 07 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108238