<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 718 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108236</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the disallowance of Modvat credit unjustified due to lack of concrete evidence. The appellants&#039; possession of a machine for manufacturing Ball Bearings was upheld, as they operated independently with proper registration and duty payments. Lack of proof of clandestine activities led to setting aside penalties and confiscation orders, granting relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:48:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145253" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 718 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108236</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the disallowance of Modvat credit unjustified due to lack of concrete evidence. The appellants&#039; possession of a machine for manufacturing Ball Bearings was upheld, as they operated independently with proper registration and duty payments. Lack of proof of clandestine activities led to setting aside penalties and confiscation orders, granting relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>