https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108235 Amended section 100A of the Code of Civil Procedure bars a further intra-court appeal where a Single Judge of a High Court has heard and decided an appeal from an original or appellate decree or order. The right of appeal is substantive and vested, but it may be taken away by express words or necessary intendment; the amendment's purpose is to curtail delay and finalise litigation. That restriction applies to Single Judge decisions made on or after 1 July 2002, even if the original proceedings began earlier. In a matter arising under section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, no separate provision preserved a Letters Patent Appeal, so the intra-court appeal was not maintainable. en-us Mon, 30 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:47:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108235 Amended section 100A of the Code of Civil Procedure bars a further intra-court appeal where a Single Judge of a High Court has heard and decided an appeal from an original or appellate decree or order. The right of appeal is substantive and vested, but it may be taken away by express words or necessary intendment; the amendment's purpose is to curtail delay and finalise litigation. That restriction applies to Single Judge decisions made on or after 1 July 2002, even if the original proceedings began earlier. In a matter arising under section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, no separate provision preserved a Letters Patent Appeal, so the intra-court appeal was not maintainable. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 30 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108235