https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108229 The High Court dismissed the Chairman's claim for salary, allowances, and facilities equivalent to Ministers of State, ruling that entitlement is subject to specific notifications and governed by the Corporation's Articles of Association. The Court clarified that liability for employees rests with the Corporation, not the State Government, and directed the petitioner to pursue claims against the Corporation, which had already rejected the claim. The judgment found no merit in the petition, with no costs awarded, advising the petitioner to address the claim during the Corporation's liquidation proceedings. en-us Thu, 26 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Mar 2012 15:41:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108229 The High Court dismissed the Chairman's claim for salary, allowances, and facilities equivalent to Ministers of State, ruling that entitlement is subject to specific notifications and governed by the Corporation's Articles of Association. The Court clarified that liability for employees rests with the Corporation, not the State Government, and directed the petitioner to pursue claims against the Corporation, which had already rejected the claim. The judgment found no merit in the petition, with no costs awarded, advising the petitioner to address the claim during the Corporation's liquidation proceedings. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 26 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108229