<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 356 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108193</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Commission&#039;s decision, ruling that the petitioners are proper parties in the proceedings concerning a faulty alternator. The petitioners were penalized for concealing material facts and the petition was dismissed with costs. The Court stressed the importance of full disclosure when seeking relief and including proper parties to prevent multiple proceedings and ensure effective adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:25:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 356 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108193</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Commission&#039;s decision, ruling that the petitioners are proper parties in the proceedings concerning a faulty alternator. The petitioners were penalized for concealing material facts and the petition was dismissed with costs. The Court stressed the importance of full disclosure when seeking relief and including proper parties to prevent multiple proceedings and ensure effective adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>