<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (4) TMI 854 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108192</link>
    <description>A prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of penalty recovery was found where the demand appeared time-barred. The valuation dispute concerned goods cleared during the relevant period, while the petroleum price revision took effect retrospectively only later. At the interlocutory stage, the correspondence with the Ministry was not shown to be required disclosure to the excise department. On that material, limitation was a strong prima facie ground, and recovery of the penalty was stayed pending the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:25:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (4) TMI 854 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108192</link>
      <description>A prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of penalty recovery was found where the demand appeared time-barred. The valuation dispute concerned goods cleared during the relevant period, while the petroleum price revision took effect retrospectively only later. At the interlocutory stage, the correspondence with the Ministry was not shown to be required disclosure to the excise department. On that material, limitation was a strong prima facie ground, and recovery of the penalty was stayed pending the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>