https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108190 A reference application filed beyond the prescribed sixty-day period was time-barred because the date of receipt of the order was not shown and the filing was found to be out of time. The applications also failed procedural requirements since the prescribed form required signatures by the applicants, but only the verification was signed by the Factory Manager. Non-compliance with the limitation period and the mandatory form and signature requirements rendered the reference applications not maintainable. en-us Tue, 09 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:23:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108190 A reference application filed beyond the prescribed sixty-day period was time-barred because the date of receipt of the order was not shown and the filing was found to be out of time. The applications also failed procedural requirements since the prescribed form required signatures by the applicants, but only the verification was signed by the Factory Manager. Non-compliance with the limitation period and the mandatory form and signature requirements rendered the reference applications not maintainable. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 09 Apr 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108190