<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 354 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108188</link>
    <description>Prior publication can render a registered design vulnerable to cancellation under the Designs Act, 2000, including where publication occurred in India or abroad before registration. The repeal-and-savings framework may preserve registrations obtained under the 1911 Act while applying the 2000 Act&#039;s cancellation grounds to later infringement disputes. Passing off depends on the overall commercial impression of competing goods, rather than a descriptive word mark alone. Colour scheme, configuration, lettering, word arrangement and general get-up may collectively create deceptive similarity, misrepresent trade origin and justify injunctive relief where purchasers are likely to be misled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:21:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 354 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108188</link>
      <description>Prior publication can render a registered design vulnerable to cancellation under the Designs Act, 2000, including where publication occurred in India or abroad before registration. The repeal-and-savings framework may preserve registrations obtained under the 1911 Act while applying the 2000 Act&#039;s cancellation grounds to later infringement disputes. Passing off depends on the overall commercial impression of competing goods, rather than a descriptive word mark alone. Colour scheme, configuration, lettering, word arrangement and general get-up may collectively create deceptive similarity, misrepresent trade origin and justify injunctive relief where purchasers are likely to be misled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>