<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (2) TMI 1261 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108183</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) lacked jurisdiction to issue the show cause notice or adjudicate the matter, as only a proper officer designated under the Customs Act could do so. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed, with any consequential relief to be granted according to the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:10:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145200" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (2) TMI 1261 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108183</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) lacked jurisdiction to issue the show cause notice or adjudicate the matter, as only a proper officer designated under the Customs Act could do so. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeals were allowed, with any consequential relief to be granted according to the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>