https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108174 The appeal was rejected, and the demand for additional customs duty was upheld. The court found that the imported machines did not qualify for the NIL CVD exemption under Notification No. 29/97 as they were not directly used in the manufacture of textile garments. The appellant's arguments and cited precedents were deemed inapplicable or insufficient to overturn the Customs Authorities' decision. en-us Tue, 10 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:31:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108174 The appeal was rejected, and the demand for additional customs duty was upheld. The court found that the imported machines did not qualify for the NIL CVD exemption under Notification No. 29/97 as they were not directly used in the manufacture of textile garments. The appellant's arguments and cited precedents were deemed inapplicable or insufficient to overturn the Customs Authorities' decision. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 10 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108174