<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 411 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108173</link>
    <description>The High Court of Delhi determined it lacked jurisdiction to entertain a petition involving offences allegedly committed by companies with registered offices outside Delhi, where the alleged offences occurred. Citing relevant precedents, the court emphasized that the cause of action must arise within the court&#039;s territorial limits. As none of the facts pleaded constituted a cause of action in Delhi, the court dismissed the petition without delving into the compounding of offences under the Companies Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:37:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 411 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108173</link>
      <description>The High Court of Delhi determined it lacked jurisdiction to entertain a petition involving offences allegedly committed by companies with registered offices outside Delhi, where the alleged offences occurred. Citing relevant precedents, the court emphasized that the cause of action must arise within the court&#039;s territorial limits. As none of the facts pleaded constituted a cause of action in Delhi, the court dismissed the petition without delving into the compounding of offences under the Companies Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108173</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>