https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108167 A remote past association of an arbitrator with a group company, without any present interest, affiliation, or predisposition, was treated as insufficient to create justifiable doubts about independence or impartiality; the challenge to the arbitrator was rejected. On the scope of section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, arbitral proceedings against a guarantor were held not to fall within the statutory bar because the provision, read by its language and object, targets coercive recovery actions and uses "suit" in distinction from "proceeding". The dismissal of the challenge to the award was sustained. en-us Tue, 29 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Aug 2020 12:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108167 A remote past association of an arbitrator with a group company, without any present interest, affiliation, or predisposition, was treated as insufficient to create justifiable doubts about independence or impartiality; the challenge to the arbitrator was rejected. On the scope of section 22 of the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985, arbitral proceedings against a guarantor were held not to fall within the statutory bar because the provision, read by its language and object, targets coercive recovery actions and uses "suit" in distinction from "proceeding". The dismissal of the challenge to the award was sustained. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 29 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108167