https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108166 The Tribunal found no legal flaw in the Final Order, emphasizing the sufficiency of evidence and the importance of the overall view. It upheld the allegations of suppression and evasion, noting the detailed examination of evidence by authorities. The Tribunal clarified that rectification powers under Section 35C were limited to obvious mistakes, rejecting the application for rectification. The judgment highlighted the significance of evidence examination, jurisdictional actions, and the constraints on rectification powers. en-us Fri, 25 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:19:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108166 The Tribunal found no legal flaw in the Final Order, emphasizing the sufficiency of evidence and the importance of the overall view. It upheld the allegations of suppression and evasion, noting the detailed examination of evidence by authorities. The Tribunal clarified that rectification powers under Section 35C were limited to obvious mistakes, rejecting the application for rectification. The judgment highlighted the significance of evidence examination, jurisdictional actions, and the constraints on rectification powers. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 25 May 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108166