<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (3) TMI 1030 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108157</link>
    <description>Confiscation of seized C.R. coils and the related penalty were held unsustainable because the Department did not prove that the goods were fully manufactured and unaccounted for. The record showed that the coils were found inside the factory, and the adjudicating authority failed to properly assess the assessee&#039;s reconciliation material, RG-1 records, and Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate. In the absence of evidence that the goods were intended for removal without statutory accounting, the Department could not justify confiscation or penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:09:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145174" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (3) TMI 1030 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108157</link>
      <description>Confiscation of seized C.R. coils and the related penalty were held unsustainable because the Department did not prove that the goods were fully manufactured and unaccounted for. The record showed that the coils were found inside the factory, and the adjudicating authority failed to properly assess the assessee&#039;s reconciliation material, RG-1 records, and Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate. In the absence of evidence that the goods were intended for removal without statutory accounting, the Department could not justify confiscation or penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108157</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>