<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (12) TMI 822 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108155</link>
    <description>Appointment as President of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal was treated as a distinct tenure post in a different cadre from the post of Member. The Rules and statutory scheme showed that the President&#039;s office carried separate responsibilities, pay and tenure, and a Member appointed substantively as President acquired lien on that post. Applying the Fundamental Rules, a Government servant cannot hold lien on two permanent posts at once, and lien on the earlier post ends when a permanent post outside the original cadre is taken up. The petitioner therefore did not retain lien on the post of Member and had no right to revert after the presidential tenure ended.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 13:03:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (12) TMI 822 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108155</link>
      <description>Appointment as President of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal was treated as a distinct tenure post in a different cadre from the post of Member. The Rules and statutory scheme showed that the President&#039;s office carried separate responsibilities, pay and tenure, and a Member appointed substantively as President acquired lien on that post. Applying the Fundamental Rules, a Government servant cannot hold lien on two permanent posts at once, and lien on the earlier post ends when a permanent post outside the original cadre is taken up. The petitioner therefore did not retain lien on the post of Member and had no right to revert after the presidential tenure ended.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Dec 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108155</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>