https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108132 The court dismissed the petition under section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 due to the unclaimed notice not being effectively served on the respondent company as required by law. Despite arguments invoking section 27 of the General Clauses Act, the court emphasized the mandatory nature of serving the notice before initiating winding-up proceedings. The judgment clarified that mere sending of the notice, without actual receipt by the respondent, does not fulfill the statutory requirement. Additionally, the court distinguished a Supreme Court judgment under the Negotiable Instruments Act, highlighting the distinction in requirements between the two statutes. en-us Thu, 17 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:21:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108132 The court dismissed the petition under section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 due to the unclaimed notice not being effectively served on the respondent company as required by law. Despite arguments invoking section 27 of the General Clauses Act, the court emphasized the mandatory nature of serving the notice before initiating winding-up proceedings. The judgment clarified that mere sending of the notice, without actual receipt by the respondent, does not fulfill the statutory requirement. Additionally, the court distinguished a Supreme Court judgment under the Negotiable Instruments Act, highlighting the distinction in requirements between the two statutes. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 17 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108132