<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 1052 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108129</link>
    <description>The court decided to keep the winding up order against M/s. Srishti Video Corporation Limited in abeyance under relevant sections of the Companies Act. Settlement proposals with secured creditors were considered, and no opposition to the company&#039;s revival was noted. The court ordered the winding up order to remain suspended until further orders, granting creditors the liberty to approach if the company defaulted on settlements. The official liquidator was directed to return possession of assets, hold realizations in a fixed deposit, and report compliance within a specified timeline. The application for the recall of the winding up order was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:07:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 1052 - HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108129</link>
      <description>The court decided to keep the winding up order against M/s. Srishti Video Corporation Limited in abeyance under relevant sections of the Companies Act. Settlement proposals with secured creditors were considered, and no opposition to the company&#039;s revival was noted. The court ordered the winding up order to remain suspended until further orders, granting creditors the liberty to approach if the company defaulted on settlements. The official liquidator was directed to return possession of assets, hold realizations in a fixed deposit, and report compliance within a specified timeline. The application for the recall of the winding up order was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>