<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (8) TMI 539 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108116</link>
    <description>Notional interest on an advance received from the buyer was not includible in the assessable value of tailor-made goods for central excise purposes where the goods were manufactured to specification and the advance was taken as a normal trade practice to guard against non-clearance. In the absence of any material showing that the advance depressed the price, no nexus existed between the advance and the price, so the proposed enhancement of assessable value was unwarranted and the demand was liable to be set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:19:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=145133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (8) TMI 539 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108116</link>
      <description>Notional interest on an advance received from the buyer was not includible in the assessable value of tailor-made goods for central excise purposes where the goods were manufactured to specification and the advance was taken as a normal trade practice to guard against non-clearance. In the absence of any material showing that the advance depressed the price, no nexus existed between the advance and the price, so the proposed enhancement of assessable value was unwarranted and the demand was liable to be set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=108116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>